A piece of representation
of my candidate can be found on the website of CNN. With the headline of
“Sebelius’ Term was a Disaster” they clearly made an opinion of my candidate,
and not in a very good light. For example the second quote of the entire article
is, “Sadly her
term as secretary of Health and Human Services was a disaster.”
You
can see the full article here:
http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/11/opinion/gingrich-sebelius-right-to-resign/
They
attack her by painting a negative image of her while in office. They talk about
how American’s should be able to expect that people who enter high public
office will see their job as a public duty and will view faithfully serving the
public and administering the laws as their solemn obligation. Which in this
case CNN is making readers view Sebelius as someone that didn’t take her job
seriously.
Also they take a spin and make her
into somewhat of a follower, mentioning that whatever she did was echoing Obama
and his decisions and ideas. Mirroring her ideas after his as mentioned in the
article. They make the reader’s view her as secretive and conniving. For
example they list some examples in the article with this quote: “She made
dozens of changes to policy without the authority to do so, from waiving
welfare's work requirement to pressuring
insurance companies for Obamacare implementation dollars after
Congress denied her budget request to delaying the
employer mandate--twice--outside the confines of the legislation.”
Overall this pushes back against the
image Kathleen Sebelius is striving for and wants to create for herself. In my
blog two I mentioned that Kathleen’s image is very positive. She values “pro-choice” and
education most. She has the image of a mother, a caretaker but also a strong
leader and woman. She runs on many political positions but overall wants
people to see that she will do whatever needs to be done to keep the best interest
for the people.
This website of CNN paints a horrifying exact opposite of
Kathleen.
In my opinion I think that this
article does shift the image on Kathleen Sebelius for some readers but in this
case probably uninformed voters or people that were never for her in the first
place. It came out after she was in office. I think you can find a bad review
on any politician for any given time-period some where. With CNN you just
wouldn’t have to do as much digging.


Do you know who the author is? If so, do you know anything about them? Do you know what party they are from? Could this affect the authors perspective of Sebelius?
ReplyDelete